Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

NAFI Study Finds CFI Pay Is Insufficient

By Pia Bergqvist / Published: Jan 03, 2013
Rate it! 0% or 100%
Cessna 172

Cessna 172

The National Association of Flight Instructors (NAFI) has polled its members to get a sense of the compensation instructors are receiving for their services to determine the ability of the industry to train future pilots.

NAFI is still evaluating the results and collecting more data, but the initial analysis does not bode well for the industry. With more than 1,000 responses, the conclusion of the study is that many instructors may not be able to make ends meet and are forced to take a second job to make enough money to support themselves.

The study separated instructors into four categories: instructors from FBO-style flight schools; academy-style facilities; major universities; and independent flight instructors. Most instructors receive a percentage of the amount charged to the students for their services. More than 60 percent of academy-style instructors said they receive less than 50 percent of the billable per hour cost. As a result, most instructors received less than $50 per hour for their services and the majority, nearly 50 percent of the respondents, were compensated between $25 and $50 per hour. While this is far above minimum wage, instructors only get paid for the hours billed, which can be considerably less than the time spent to train each student.

In addition to teaching, nearly 50 percent of the polled instructors indicated that they are responsible for activities for which they receive no compensation, such as “student follow up, student prospecting and marketing efforts,” according to NAFI.

“Until we can bring wages for instructors up to a level commensurate with the investment in training they have incurred and to a level that allows [flight instruction] to be competitive as full-time employment, we are likely to see instruction remain a part-time way they support themselves,” said NAFI Executive Director Jason Blair. How the industry can achieve this goal without increasing the already high cost of flight training remains to be seen.

Comments (8) Post a comment

All Comments

elmog's picture

It's no so much that they're underpaid, but that they don't fly enough hours to make ends meet!

N3922B's picture

It took an entire study to figure out that CFIs aren't paid enough?
Next, they'll uncover shocking news that the regional airlines and most other entry level flying jobs don't pay squat either.

billcuster's picture

I've worked at FBO's and independently, and at an academy. NONE of those paid CLOSE to what is being portrayed in this article. High of $35hr for independent, which you are very effective if you can bill 23-30hrs in a 6 day week, and $17-22 per hour for academies and FBO's where you're doing great if you can earn $2,500 in a month. Less than $50 an hour? Duh.

mrowden's picture

I began my journey into professional aviation in 2001. I was 29 and it was a second career for me. The first full two years were spent as a full-time CFI. My average gross income as a CFI was $12K each year, less than one-fifth from the career I left. My first employer, a well-known national provider of flight training, billed customers $60-70/hr for our services yet paid us CFI's only $11-14/hr of that. While the ratio of billing vs. compensation improved with my second and third employers, most instructors I knew, including myself, had to work second jobs just to survive.

I believe CFI compensation WILL be addressed in the not-too-distant future, one way or another. Unless enough forward-thinking exists to finally bring CFI compensation to an appropriate level that will attract talented new instructors, flight training providers will be looking head-on at a real crisis for CFI services. In the later, the market will determine the compensation necessary to attract and retain flight instructors, as is the case with most labor...and I do not imagine most flight schools will like the outcome.

dennisflysfast's picture

I'm sure all those CFI's paying money to NAFI feel that this study was money well spent, and will be more excited to pay their dues next year. #sarcasm

iused2fly's picture

$50/hour? Perhaps a few guys teaching ATP students and refresher courses in the latest full-motion simulators might get that rate, but the overwhelming majority of instructors are paid the minimum rate by flight schools. That certainly was the case for me.

In the mid-1970s I worded up north in mining jobs, making enough $$$ to pay for my private, commercial, IFR and instructor's ratings. I instructed for nearly three years, needing a second job driving an airport shuttle in the colder months to make ends meet.
The longer I stuck with it the more seniority I got at the school, which led to more lucrative hours, teaching commercial, IFR and multi-engine ratings in piston twins. The dollar stretched a lot farther than it does today. Rents were a lot more reasonable, especially if you had a roommate or two to share costs with. The airport shuttle job was mostly from November to April, when there weren't as as many students.

From May to October I flew my ass off. I was flying and logging1350 hours a year, about a third of that IFR and multi-engine PIC hours, all for free. Granted, the situation for me in the 70s was different than it is today. There were enough people looking to learn to fly in the 1970s that pulling in 30 hours in five or six long days in the warmer months was possible. Airplanes were WAY less expensive to rent so more people learned to fly. I didn't have my earning power eroded for a generation by stagnant wages.

Eventually I found a job that didn't pay much better, second pilot/baggage handler and in a DeHavilland Twin Otter on floats, operating from harbour to harbour in BC. It was 13 hour days, about 8 air hours/day, lousy weather for six months a year, but it was turbine time, the kind of experience the airlines were looking for.

Over time I got good contacts in the industry, one eventually steering me toward a nicer gig co-piloting Beech King Airs and Merlin IIs. Eighteen months later I made right seat in a Dash 8-200, flying regional hops in western Canada. My last 25 years were in 737s and Dc-10s for CPAir, flying longer regional hops all around western Canada, the last 18 in the left seat. I was lucky and only got furloughed out a couple of times for short periods. Made enough money to buy a decent house, a couple vehicles and raise a family. Had I given up when I was young because of poor wages at the flight school, my lucrative job flying jets never would have happened.

If I had a burning desire for an aviation career today I'd start as early as possible, get as many ratings as I could afford and then look seriously into a military career. A couple of terms flying turbine military equipment where they provide the training, plus the discipline that military life teaches, is a terrific foundation from which to find a not quite a good airline job. Or captaining a corp jet, moving VIPS around in style.

I get that it's tougher today, with fewer people looking to fly, but it still boils down to this: how bad do you want it? If you really want to get the better flying jobs, you have to put in your time like everybody else. Nobody is just going to hand it to you because you're a nice guy.

Douglas M
Surrey, BC

ifly's picture

I loved teaching, but to make any money you have to burn yourself out. I instructed in the early 90s and my rates was $14 an hour. Had to live with my parents...
It's a tough business. I wish there were more options to build experience. It's not an optimal situation for either party involved. I would rather see folks teach part time, but do it with a passion. May second career types.

emailjh1's picture

I was discussing this article with my flight instructor...his comments related to awareness and how NAFI should really tell the story...

Rent: $1250/mt (cheap 1 bedroom apartment in Northern VA )
Utilities: $150/mt
Student Loans: $400/mt
Car Payment: $150/mt (cheap used car )
Car Insurance: $50/mt (good driving record over 30 years of age )
Health care Insurance: $300/mt
Gas Bill: $200/mt ( 4 miles round trip for work per day )
Cell Phone bill: $100/mt
Monthly Food Budget $300/mt ( $10 per day )
Cost of miscellaneous items (car repairs, eating out, travel expenses, gifts, dates, taxes, etc, etc ) not included

Monthly Cost of Living $2,900
Yearly Cost of Living $34,800

I can say that I am probably in the top 10% of the top earning non-salary flight Instructors in the No. Va / DC area and possibly the country.

Over the last five years my average annual Net income is: $19,000, annual gross income: $24,000.

Now with the new FAA 1500 rule going into effect this year only ensures that all civilian flight instructors will now have to live under these conditions for at least 3 to 4 years before they can reach required minimum hours before moving into the regional airlines and moving up. Not to mention the conditions and pay at the airlines they will endure for years until they can build seniority.

All while maintaining the high standards of safety provided by the FAA. Now who wants to go flying?!?!

I wish that NAFI story told it like this.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use