Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

NTSB Criticizes Gulfstream Over G650 Crash Investigation

By Bethany Whitfield / Published: Jun 21, 2012
Rate it! or
Gulfstream G650

The Gulfstream G650 at EBACE 2012

As investigators continue to probe the fatal 2011 crash of a Gulfstream G650 test aircraft, the NTSB recently voiced some harsh words regarding Gulfstream’s handling of the investigation.

In a letter dated April 4, 2012, NTSB Chairman Deborah Hersman outlined a number of offenses committed by the bizjet giant, including information withholding, noncompliance with NTSB regulations, delayed correspondence and “general conduct and dilatory tactics prejudicial to the investigation.”

The letter cited “unexplained missing evidence,” including a hard drive containing telemetry data from the ill-fated test flight. Other complaints lodged by Hersman included Gulfstream’s withholding of the results of its own internal safety audit, the “combative and argumentative behavior on the part of Gulfstream’s legal counsel during witness interviews,” and “excessive objections to disclosure of factual information based on claims of protection for proprietary data.”

In a letter dated March 30, 2012, Gulfstream President Larry Flynn struck back against the charges, evidently voiced previously at an earlier meeting between the two parties.

In it he maintained that once it was discovered that the missing telemetry hard drive was not stolen, the employee in charge of its safekeeping was terminated. Flynn also addressed the issue of the company’s internal safety review, stating that Gulfstream allowed the NTSB to conduct an on-site review of the study results.

Flynn argued that Gulfstream has responded to all NTSB information requests “as promptly as possible,” and said that, due to the accident occurring during a test flight, “Gulfstream has provided an enormous amount of trade secret and proprietary information to the NTSB – much more than would be required for an accident involving an in-service model.” Flynn also cited a canceled meeting and delayed correspondence on the NTSB’s end.

While the NTSB has not released its final report on the official cause of the crash, Gulfstream says it thinks it likely occurred due to an unachievable take-off angle as well as a takeoff speed schedule that was not appropriately formed.

According to the NTSB’s preliminary report on the crash, the accident occurred when the G650’s wing hit the runway on rotation, causing the aircraft to burst into flames and killing all four Gulfstream employees aboard. The airplane was attempting to conduct a takeoff with a simulated engine failure to ascertain minimal flap settings for the jet at the time of the crash.

The NTSB is expected to release its final report on the crash investigation later this year.

Comments (4) Post a comment

All Comments

ReallyNow's picture

Watch Out For the B---- at the NTSB

Lambo805's picture

Here's A thought, finish investigating the FATAL accident between an NTSB and FAA pilot before you go attacking a billionaire safety giant like Gulfstream. Just saying..glass house and all.

SocalFlyer's picture

The NTSB, although a highly professional organization/group in many respects, suffers from the same structural “gotcha” that infects many other government bureaucracies.

Fighter pilots speak of “target fixation”, in which a myopic concentration on the target leads to flight into the ground, or other aircraft. Government bureaucracies that are chartered to deliver a specific product without regard to other factors tend to follow the same path as a target fixated pilot.

In the case of the NTSB, it leads to the issuance of “recommendations” that may/might increase safety by 0.0003% at a cost of tens of millions of dollars. Being insulated from competing factors also promotes a culture of judgmental invincibility, where it is an accepted view that opposing views range from inferior to valueless.

skyscooteruk's picture

I worked for Gulfstream once on the maintenance side of their business - I really thought I had arrived ! - It was like thinking I was going to work for a TOP TOP 5 Star Restaurant where SAFETY(Airworthiness) and QUALITY took precedence over SCHEDULE -Disappointingly only to find I was working for a bottom end fast food drive thro where low costs to customer + fast turn around = higher $ margins and customer return business based on cost and short down time even if it means compromising safety AND Regulations – ie SCHEDULE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE takes priority over the Corporate mission statement of SAFETY QUALITY SCHEDULE to which this arrogant dangerously incompetently managed company pays lip service – Sadly it was only when yet another Gulfstream employee got hurt that I had the courage to face my fears of losing my job and document my concerns only to be fired as a result – The NTSB has my sympathies in dealing with this Arrogant Corporate Monster – I wonder how many more people employed by Gulfstream are going to be killed injured and lose their jobs before the FAA/NTSB are allowed to really slap this Corporation into realizing that NO ONE in America is above the LAW ??!!

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use