Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

FAA Slows Pace of UAV Integration

By Stephen Pope / Published: Nov 21, 2012
Rate it! 0% or 100%

Citing safety concerns and privacy issues, the FAA has delayed the selection of U.S. sites for the testing of unmanned aircraft, effectively putting the brakes on a push to integrate UAVs into civil airspace.

In a letter to Republican Congressman Howard McKeon of California, chairman of the House Unmanned Systems Caucus, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said the establishment of six test sites for UAV for experimentation has been suspended indefinitely.

“Our target was to have six test sites by the end of 2012,” Huerta wrote in the letter. "However, increasing the use of UAS in our airspace also raises privacy issues, and these issues will need to be addressed as unmanned aircraft are safely integrated."

Members of Congress in states where unmanned arial systems are built bristled at news of the delay, and in particular the FAA’s contention that it was moving to protect privacy, which they said has never been a part of the agency’s mandate.

“It’s unacceptable in my book that they’re delaying this,” Ohio Congressman Steve Austria told the Dayton Daily News. “The reasons they’re giving us are the reasons they gave us four years ago.”

UAV testing was included in the FAA’s latest reauthorization, the Congressional legislation that funds the agency. The same legislation commits the FAA to establishing rules to integrate small UAVs by 2015.

“The FAA will complete its statutory obligations to integrate UAS into the national airspace as quickly and efficiently as possible,” Huerta’s letter states. "However, we must fulfill those obligations in a thoughtful, prudent manner that ensures safety, addresses privacy issues, and promotes economic growth.”

Comments (4) Post a comment

All Comments

airbusflyboy's picture

Given the constant threat against this nation at any time, we need to get these UAV vehicles in the air and approved for surveillance as soon as practical, this technology is badly needed especially to police our U.S. BORDERS of which there is too much time and money being spent in a wasteful and non-productive manner ................. UAV technology is the present and future security of this country and we must embrace it and use it in a most diligent and efficacious manner, to achieve the proper level of intelligence and security for the USA.
The airspace these vehicles will use must be dedicated and strongly enforced to prevent inadvertent and possible collision with other airspace users. The times have changed and we must change along with it for our own good and protections.

RobT's picture

I appreciate this position taken by Michael Huerta. The UAV approval process has followed the path of a political ramrod. Recall that their first attempt was to overrule the FAA and declare it irrelevant.

This issue is driven by the fact that taxpayers have paid for the development of what will now be a robust private UAV market. These guys can't wait and they have purchased the finest Congressmen they can get to do their bidding.

aabreu's picture

There are many people that have a problem with the our government using UAVs for surveillance. I happen to be one of them. The reasons for using them are a mile long by those agencies that want to get there hands on them... especially law enforcement. Giving law enforcement the power effectively spy on everyone 24/7 is going too far. The buck stops here.
The previous comments about protections and safety and jobs... hogwash.

Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

SBarnettW's picture

Kudos to Huerta for taking this unpopular stand. It feels odd to be cheering the FAA, but here they definitely did the right thing. I wish Austria would not talk so much....presumably he's vocal because Springfield-Beckley Municipal (KSGH) has been bidding for consideration as a drone test site for a while now. They're desperate to get it since the OH ANG left several years ago. It's now a huge airport with nothing happening. But I digress....

As a wise man once said, those who sacrifice a little liberty for an increase in safety will soon find they have neither. Thank you Huerta.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use