What Is the Difference Between RNAV Z and Y Approaches?

Broadly speaking, the Y approach is more geared toward single-engine, piston-powered aircraft, and the Z approach more appropriate for jets.

It's important to pick the right approach for the aircraft you're flying. [Shutterstock]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • RNAV (GPS) Y and Z approaches for the same runway are designed for different aircraft types, with Y typically for piston aircraft and Z more appropriate for jets.
  • Key differences between Y and Z approaches include lower weather minimums for Z, varied aircraft equipment and pilot certification requirements, different step-down fixes, altitudes, and missed approach instructions.
  • Pilots must request the RNAV approach (Y or Z) that is most appropriate for their aircraft type and pilot qualifications, informing ATC if they are "unable" to meet the criteria for a specific approach.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Question: I am an instrument pilot in training at an airport that has two RNAV approaches for the same runway. One is labeled RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16; the other is RNAV (GPS) Z 16. Why would the FAA create two GPS approaches to the same runway?

Answer: Broadly speaking, the Y approach is more geared toward single-engine, piston-powered aircraft, and the Z approach more appropriate for jets.

Put the approach plates side by side and you’ll note the Z has lower weather minimums than the Y. They may also require different aircraft equipment and pilot certification, step-down fixes, and altitudes. The devil can be in the details, as a side-by-side comparison may reveal different missed approach instructions and one with a virtual glideslope that is not coincident with the RNAV glide path. One may allow circling, while the other does not.

When requesting an approach at an airport with both the Z and Y variant, make sure you ask for the one most appropriate for your aircraft and pilot qualifications. If you (or your aircraft) don’t meet the approach criteria, be sure to tell ATC “unable.”

Meg Godlewski

Meg Godlewski has been an aviation journalist for more than 24 years and a CFI for more than 20 years. If she is not flying or teaching aviation, she is writing about it. Meg is a founding member of the Pilot Proficiency Center at EAA AirVenture and excels at the application of simulation technology to flatten the learning curve. Follow Meg on Twitter @2Lewski.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE