Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
The article challenges the common, uncritical condemnation of zero-zero (low-visibility) takeoffs, arguing it stems from a lack of analytical risk assessment.
It demonstrates that a zero-zero takeoff is operationally equivalent in risk to executing a missed approach at 200 feet AGL in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC), highlighting a double standard in pilot judgment.
The author advocates for consistent, thoughtful risk management in aviation, urging pilots to base decisions on individual proficiency and circumstances rather than adopting generalized, unexamined opinions.
Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.
