Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
The article argues that taking off in zero-zero conditions is operationally comparable to executing a missed approach at 200 feet AGL in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC), sharing an identical risk profile from that point upward.
It criticizes the "knee-jerk" condemnation of zero-zero departures, advocating against a double standard where pilots accept missed approaches but deem low-visibility takeoffs as uniquely irresponsible.
The author emphasizes that effective risk management in general aviation requires sober, individual analysis of facts and circumstances, rather than unthinking adherence to platitudes or generalized opinions.
Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.
