Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
The article challenges the common belief that zero-zero (low-visibility) takeoffs are uniquely risky or dumb, arguing that such condemnation is often based on unthinking adherence to platitudes rather than sober analysis.
It posits that a zero-zero departure is operationally and risk-wise equivalent to executing a missed approach in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) when the runway is not sighted at 200 feet AGL.
The author contends that pilots who consider IMC missed approaches routine should apply a consistent standard to low-visibility departures, as both present comparable operational concerns and risks from 200 feet AGL onward.
True aviation safety is advanced by careful, individualized risk analysis and management based on specific circumstances and pilot proficiency, not by blanket, unexamined rules or double standards.
Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.
