Register

Technicalities: What Worked and What Didn’t

After Melmoth (left) was wrecked in 1982, I decided to try again. Peter Garrison
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The author's 23 years of homebuilding experience taught valuable lessons, confirming the worth of features like self-built retractable gear and effective Fowler flaps, while identifying others as useless (adjustable ailerons) or problematic (leaky hydraulics, stabilator icing).
  • The iterative design process, central to experimental aviation, led to continuous improvements between aircraft, such as refined airbrake designs, better control feel, and more accurate fuel monitoring.
  • Key design insights emphasize that increased wingspan is "magic" for enhancing range and climb performance, while wing area is "overrated," and practical considerations like system reliability and cabin access are crucial for overall usability.
See a mistake? Contact us.

After 14 years of flying my second homebuilt, preceded by nine years in my first, I wish I could say that most things that can go wrong already have, but the gods might think me insolent. By now, however, I can at least say with some confidence what has worked and what has not.

Peter Garrison

Peter Garrison taught himself to use a slide rule and tin snips, built an airplane in his backyard, and flew it to Japan. He began contributing to FLYING in 1968, and he continues to share his columns, ""Technicalities"" and ""Aftermath,"" with FLYING readers.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE