Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
The article challenges the common condemnation of zero-zero (low-visibility) takeoffs, arguing it's often a knee-jerk reaction based on opinion rather than compelling evidence.
It demonstrates that, operationally, a zero-zero takeoff is functionally identical in risk and conditions to executing a missed approach in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) at 200 feet AGL.
The author asserts there should be no double standard, as objections to low-visibility takeoffs apply equally to IMC missed approaches, advocating for a sober, fact-based analysis of aviation risks over platitudes.
Last year I read in a major aviation publication that lifting off in zero-zero conditions was one of the riskiest and dumbest decisions in all of flying. In late October 2014, I attended the annual convention of a major flying club, where I heard basically that same conversation and conclusion. If I had any hair on my shiny bald head, I would pull it out in frustration.
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.
