Personal Minimums?

We typically dont recommend establishing hard weather or runway minimums. Why refuse to fly an ILS to 200 and a half if the tops are at 500?

Key Takeaways:

• The article argues against rigid, hard weather or runway minimums, stating that personal minimums are meant to be flexible and adaptable.
• Flight decisions should incorporate a broad range of factors, including subjective elements like pilot well-being and recent experience, rather than solely objective standards.
• It recommends using a Flight Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) to systematically evaluate risks by tallying the "pluses" and "minuses" for any given flight.
• A flight should only proceed if the "pluses" significantly outweigh the "minuses," requiring adjustments or cancellation if the risk balance is unfavorable.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.