Over the past few years the FAA has added new non-precision instrument approaches at a remarkable rate-thousands of procedures with names like LNAV and VNAV, and ILS-comparable LPV approaches-2208 LPV approaches alone. The common denominator among these relative newcomers to an instrument pilots nomenclature is their dependence on the wonders of GPS, in particular, Wide Area Augmentation System-based (WAAS) GPS. The primary benefit of a WAAS-enhanced 288
NPAs: Stable Or Not?
Over the past few years the FAA has added new non-precision instrument approaches at a remarkable rate-thousands of procedures with names like LNAV and VNAV, and ILS-comparable LPV approaches-2208 LPV approaches alone. The common denominator among these relative newcomers to an instrument pilots nomenclature is their dependence on the wonders of GPS, in particular, Wide Area Augmentation System-based (WAAS) GPS. The primary benefit of a WAAS-enhanced approach is availability of a pseudo glideslope generated by the in-cockpit GPS navigator, bringing ILS-like vertical guidance where theres no ILS.
Key Takeaways:
- The FAA has significantly expanded GPS/WAAS-based instrument approaches (e.g., LPVs), which provide ILS-like vertical guidance and promote safer, constant-angle descents instead of traditional "dive-and-drive" methods.
- Constant-angle descents are generally preferred for their increased safety and reduced pilot workload, with dive-and-drive approaches linked to higher accident risks in air carrier operations.
- Despite the advantages of modern GPS approaches, traditional non-precision (dive-and-drive) methods can still offer situational benefits, such as potentially lower minimums or improved runway visibility angles under specific weather conditions.
- Pilots must understand the specific characteristics of each approach type, as differences in technology and design lead to varying minimums and optimal choices depending on the conditions.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
