Register

Martin State

Long a favorite of instructors and examiners alike, it’s time we dug into this unusual and seemingly one-off approach, at least to broaden your understanding.

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Garmin GTN navigators are capable of flying DME arcs, despite an instructor's claim, as explicitly stated in the GTN Pilot's Guide.
  • The specific KMTN VOR/TACAN RWY 15 approach is not included in navigator databases because its final approach segment, a DME arc, does not comply with ARINC-424 leg types required for coded Performance Based Navigation (PBN) procedures.
  • Even when an approach is not in the database, complex DME arc procedures can be flown manually using traditional VOR/DME, or by combining GPS for distance and azimuth information, requiring active heading control to maintain the arc.
See a mistake? Contact us.

One highly knowledgeable and respected instrument instructor categorically stated that Garmin GTN navigators cannot fly DME arcs. He used the GTN simulator to prove his claim since the KMTN VOR or TACAN RWY 15 approach (Martin State Airport in Maryland) isn’t in the database. I confirmed with Garmin that he was partially correct; the approach is not in the database. The reason it is not in the database is a bit convoluted. But his conclusion was not correct. The GTN Pilot’s Guide states, “The unit supports approaches containing DME arcs.”

Usually, I’m leery of absolutes like “never” and “always.” As in mathematics, it only takes one exception to prove the opposite. Also, we must be careful not to use inductive reasoning to reach broader conclusions from scant data. I have flown several approaches with DME arcs in the GTN databases. But what’s up with Martin State?

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE