The FAA rightly has taken its lumps on many things, leading to a healthy dose of skepticism among many in the industry whenever the agency tries something new. This is especially true whenever theres a rulemaking activity affecting general aviation training. I knew this, of course, when I began work as manager of the FAAs General Aviation and Commercial Division. After a few months in my new job, 288
Trainings Future
The FAA rightly has taken its lumps on many things, leading to a healthy dose of skepticism among many in the industry whenever the agency tries something new. This is especially true whenever theres a rulemaking activity affecting general aviation training. I knew this, of course, when I began work as manager of the FAAs General Aviation and Commercial Division. After a few months in my new job, I began surveying the landscape, which included the Garmin 430 phenomenon (I installed one in my Bonanza, as well as a multifunction display and weather data link) and a visit to Cirrus highlighted the coming "glass cockpit" revolution.
Key Takeaways:
- The FAA Industry Training Standards (FITS) were developed to modernize general aviation pilot training by shifting from outdated maneuver-based instruction to emphasizing higher-order skills like risk and automation management through scenario-based learning.
- FITS implementation faced significant resistance from the deeply ingrained training culture and internal FAA bureaucracy, leading to its current state of bureaucratization that hinders further innovation.
- The author advocates for greater industry leadership to fully integrate FITS concepts and ultimately move beyond them by updating training doctrine, standards, and curricula to address 21st-century challenges.
- New industry-led initiatives from organizations like SAFE and AOPA are now focused on reforming flight training to improve instructional quality, enhance student retention, and ultimately reduce general aviation accident rates.
See a mistake? Contact us.
