We have all been told old wives tales. Their problem is that they can take on a life of their own. Are the old wives right? Is there a bit of truth to them? Or are they just plain wrong? When it comes to ceilings as part of landing minimums the answer is a bit complicated. It begs the question, are ceilings sealing for instrument pilots or not?
For Part 91 and Part 121 IFR operations in the U.S., the reported or forecast ceiling is generally not a legal controlling factor for commencing or continuing an instrument approach.
FAA regulations, specifically 14 CFR Part 91.175(c)(2), state that only *flight visibility* is the minimum required condition for continuing an approach below MDA or DA.
This distinction, where ceiling is non-controlling, stems from regulatory changes in the mid-1960s with improved navigation technology, despite common misconceptions in pilot training and even among some FAA personnel.
While not controlling for the destination approach, both ceiling and visibility remain critical factors when determining suitable alternate airports.
We have all been told old wives tales. Their problem is that they can take on a life of their own. Are the old wives right? Is there a bit of truth to them? Or are they just plain wrong? When it comes to ceilings as part of landing minimums the answer is a bit complicated. It begs the question, are ceilings sealing for instrument pilots or not?
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.