IFR Chart Choices

A long time has passed since Elroy Jeppesen first started drawing basic descriptions of ways to get into airports when the weather was down. Thankfully, aeronautical charting has evolved with technologies and operational needs. These days, the latest panel-mount avionics and handhelds coax us into the "paperless cockpit" realm, but a variety of factors havent eliminated dead-tree charts.The good news is we have a choice, even if its among only two basic publishers. Another piece of good news is we can put down one publishers chart and pick up the others without too much confusion. While there are qualitative differences between the two publishers, a major distinction is how they distribute updates. And despite a third-party company simplifying the process, theres still a price to pay when it comes to managing revisions.

Key Takeaways:

• Despite digital advancements, physical aeronautical charts remain essential, primarily provided by FAA/AeroNav (U.S. coverage) and Jeppesen (worldwide coverage).
• The two main publishers differ significantly in chart organization, integrated data, and their revision processes, with FAA typically offering full chart replacements every 56 days and Jeppesen providing more frequent, incremental updates.
• Third-party providers like Air Chart Systems repurpose public-domain FAA data into convenient spiral-bound atlases, simplifying en route chart management.
• The article recommends a mixed approach for physical chart backups: using Air Chart Systems' IFR Atlas for en route charts and subscribing directly to FAA for approach plates, while acknowledging Jeppesen's superior chart detail.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.