Every year structural icing claims a small but steady number of airplanes. Many of the accidents are on approach in clear air-after the airplane has already collected a load of ice. We look at it afterwards and wonder-the airplane had been doing fine-why did it crash well after it escaped from icing conditions?
Many icing-related aircraft crashes, especially during approach, are caused by tail stalls rather than wing stalls, which is critical because their recovery procedures are precisely opposite (e.g., raise nose/flaps and reduce power for tail stalls).
Tail stalls occur due to ice accumulation, which disproportionately affects the tail's smaller leading edge, causing airflow separation and loss of downward lift; flap extension significantly exacerbates this by increasing the tail's angle of attack.
Pilots must distinguish between wing stall warnings (airframe buffet) and tail stall warnings (light pitch control, control wheel buffet, difficulty trimming); prevention includes avoiding ice, keeping flaps up on approach, maintaining speed, and delaying power reduction, while recovery involves immediate flap retraction, power reduction, and forceful application of up elevator.
Every year structural icing claims a small but steady number of airplanes. Many of the accidents are on approach in clear air—after the airplane has already collected a load of ice. We look at it afterwards and wonder—the airplane had been doing fine—why did it crash well after it escaped from icing conditions?
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.