Register

Cobbling It Together

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The article details a complex IFR scenario at Alpena, Michigan, where an aircraft faces multiple challenges including inoperative navigation aids, closed runways, adverse weather, and limited onboard equipment (e.g., outdated GPS).
  • Due to these constraints and local obstacles, standard approaches and circling minimums are unavailable, prompting the pilot to explore alternative options for landing.
  • The chosen solution is a Contact Approach, which allows the pilot significant discretion to maneuver visually (e.g., from an ILS breakout to a downwind) while remaining within the IFR system, emphasizing the importance of pilot judgment, regulatory understanding, and pre-coordination with ATC.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Last month’s Clinic took us to western Kentucky where we wrangled a circling-only VOR-A approach. In September, we untangled an ILS/GPS hybrid in upstate New York. For another take on a ground-based approach using GPS, plus a circle-to-land, we head to Alpena, Michigan on the shore of Lake Huron. The lake’s a frequent source of low-level clouds that often arrive at inconvenient times to obscure useful things like runway thresholds. 

We’re (barely) equipped for RNAV, with a basic GPS approved for en-route and terminal navigation. To sweeten the deal, the on-field VOR (APN) is out of service and Runway 7/25 is closed. With a 15-knot breeze from the south, Runway 19 is best, but the VOR and RNAV approaches are NA. Not a big deal; the 1500-foot ceiling works to descend via the ILS 01, break out and coordinate with the tower to fly a downwind for 19. This seems like a good plan, except…

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE