Register

Who’s Really To Blame for the FAA’s Tower Closure Mess?

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The FAA is proceeding with the closure of 149 contract air traffic control towers without performing thorough safety or cost-benefit analyses and with no long-term plan for resuming services.
  • The closures, intended to save $33 million, are criticized for disproportionate budget cuts (60% from the program vs. 5% elsewhere) and for the planned removal of equipment from relatively new towers, while less-busy FAA towers remain open.
  • FAA Administrator Michael Huerta is blamed for approving this "ill-conceived plan," with the author suggesting that attention should instead be directed towards the multi-billion dollar NextGen project's cost overruns.
See a mistake? Contact us.

In the FAA’s rush to shut down scores of the nation’s contract control towers, nobody within the agency saw it necessary to perform a thorough analysis of the potential safety ramifications. Nor did the agency conduct a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis to consider, among other things, the millions of dollars it took to build the towers at the airports that will now lose them. Perhaps worst of all, there is no long-term plan in place for resuming services at affected towers. Once they’re gone, well, who knows what happens next.

Actually, the FAA put out a helpful media “information” sheet just yesterday spelling out what will transpire at many of the towers that are now on the sequestration cutting block. It isn’t pretty.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE