Who's Looking Matters

Recently, a friend who flies out of Houston Hobby (KHOU) shared something thats bothered him for some time. Just seven miles east of Hobby is Ellington Field (KEFD), a joint-use military/civilian airport. Both airports issue TAFs. Hobbys TAFs come from the NWS and Ellingtons are issued by the military. Interestingly, sometimes there is a great disparity between the forecasts. Do they each have their own biases? Are they looking through different glasses? Its like asking two witnesses what they see in an accident that hasnt happened yet.

Editorial Staff

Monday, March 07, 2016 at 12:00 AM ET

Verified

Key Takeaways:

NWS and Military Terminal Aerodrome Forecasts (TAFs) exhibit significant differences in format, included elements, and underlying forecasting philosophy, leading to potential disparities even for geographically close airports.
NWS TAFs, issued by local Weather Forecast Offices for civilian and commercial users, blend computer models with forecaster experience and can lean towards a more optimistic outlook.
Military TAFs, produced by specialized Operational Weather Squadrons, often include more detailed information (e.g., QNH, wind shear, icing, turbulence codes) and are intentionally pessimistic to prepare crews for worst-case scenarios.
Pilots must understand the distinct biases and perspectives of NWS and military forecasters to accurately interpret TAFs and anticipate potential weather conditions.

See a mistake? Contact us.

Police-officer friends often share frustration they have piecing together an accident from testimony of the participants and the witnesses. Everyone has their own biases and perspective.

Recently, a friend who flies out of Houston Hobby (KHOU) shared something that’s bothered him for some time. Just seven miles east of Hobby is Ellington Field (KEFD), a joint-use military/civilian airport. Both airports issue TAFs. Hobby’s TAFs come from the NWS and Ellington’s are issued by the military. Interestingly, sometimes there is a great disparity between the forecasts. Do they each have their own biases? Are they looking through different glasses? It’s like asking two witnesses what they see in an accident that hasn’t happened yet.