Many myths persist about the capability of airplanes to fly in ice, appearing to support techniques for ice avoidance or landing an ice-laden airplane that make ice accumulation acceptable. “Speed saves.” “More power is better than ice protection.” “Known icing certification makes flying in ice safe.” Like any myth these are rooted in truth, but they are not necessarily true themselves. With apologies to the Discovery 288
Top Three Aircraft Icing Myths Busted
Many myths persist about the capability of airplanes to fly in ice, appearing to support techniques for ice avoidance or landing an ice-laden airplane that make ice accumulation acceptable. "Speed saves." "More power is better than ice protection." "Known icing certification makes flying in ice safe." Like any myth these are rooted in truth, but they are not necessarily true themselves. With apologies to the Discovery Channel I present these icing myths, busted. Heres our first in-flight icing myth: "Keep your speed up and you can land with a load of ice." Landing an ice-laden airplane can be tricky, even with clear approaches to the longest runway around. Performing a tight, circling approach at night in low visibility? We dont even want to think about it.
Key Takeaways:
- Common aviation myths like "speed saves," "more power is better," and "known icing certification makes it safe" are unreliable and dangerous strategies for flying in ice.
- Accumulated airframe ice severely compromises aerodynamic surfaces, reduces propeller efficiency, can block engine air inlets, and significantly limits forward visibility, making safe descent and landing difficult or impossible.
- Even aircraft certified for "known ice" are not immune to all icing conditions (e.g., supercooled large droplets) and require pilots to have a clear, pre-planned escape route to ice-free air for safe operation.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
