Manufacturer Mandates

Readers likely are familiar with the role product liability plays in general aviations history. It shares responsibility for the industrys collapse in the 1980s and it wasnt until federal legislation was enacted-the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994, which limited manufacturer liability-that some piston-engine airplane production was restarted. Separately, patterns were identified involving accidents of specific aircraft types, and addressing them became another way to minimize the risk of successful liability claims.

Robert Wright

Monday, October 24, 2016 at 12:00 AM ET

Verified

Key Takeaways:

General aviation manufacturers are motivated by product liability concerns to implement specific training, maintenance, and operational requirements to prevent accidents and enhance product safety.
While Icon Aircraft's attempt to impose highly restrictive operational agreements on its A5 aircraft faced significant customer backlash, it highlights a manufacturer's desire to control product usage for safety.
Case studies of aircraft like Robinson, Cirrus, MU-2, and Eclipse demonstrate that manufacturer-imposed or strongly-supported type-specific training, risk management, and operational requirements significantly reduce accident rates, often formalized through FAA regulations or flight manual limitations.

See a mistake? Contact us.

Readers likely are familiar with the role product liability plays in general aviation’s history. It shares responsibility for the industry’s collapse in the 1980s and it wasn’t until federal legislation was enacted—the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994, which limited manufacturer liability—that some piston-engine airplane production was restarted. Separately, patterns were identified involving accidents of specific aircraft types, and addressing them became another way to minimize the risk of successful liability claims.

So it’s no secret general aviation manufacturers are motivated to prescribe training, maintenance and other requirements involving their products as a way to prevent accidents. It’s worthwhile studying how effective these risk mitigations have been, especially as a new entrant seeks to significantly expand manufacturer-imposed operational requirements on its products.