Register

Pilot and Air Traffic Controller Communication

When you think about it, the IFR system is really a wondrous thing. For example, every airport, navaid, fix and procedure has certain basic characteristics shared by all other similar facilities. For another example, a unique name or identifier is assigned, helping eliminate confusion between ATC and pilots. To navigate from one to another, the operator requests a route, naming the various facilities to be used. A flight plan is filed, or a radio request is made, a controller compares the request to his or her needs and a clearance is issued. On one level, its a simple system. On another, its incredibly complex. So complex, in fact, errors are found every day by pilots and controllers, and then corrected. The result is a relatively safe and efficient national airspace system. One of the keys to making it all work, however, is pilots and controllers cross-checking each others work. Most of the time, no errors are found. Sometimes, though, someone forgets something, or the system proves too inflexible. In those situations, operators and ATC sit down to figure out what went wrong and develop procedures to consider each others needs. This is my tale of finding an omission in the system, and how little effort it took for a fix to be implemented.

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The IFR system, while generally safe, has complexities, with errors often arising from ATC consolidations and the use of "canned clearances" that are not always properly vetted or published.
  • A significant issue highlighted is that some regional "canned clearances" (e.g., in the Bay Area) are not published, potentially resulting in clearances that don't provide a complete, navigable route to a destination's approach fix, especially concerning for lost communications procedures.
  • Pilots have a critical responsibility to challenge and not accept clearances that are incomplete or do not provide a clear path to the destination's approach, as demonstrated by the author's experience.
  • Proactive collaboration between pilots and ATC, including reporting identified errors and following up, is essential for improving system safety and ensuring valid, flyable clearances for all.
See a mistake? Contact us.

When you think about it, the IFR system is really a wondrous thing. For example, every airport, navaid, fix and procedure has certain basic characteristics shared by all other similar facilities. For another example, a unique name or identifier is assigned, helping eliminate confusion between ATC and pilots. To navigate from one to another, the operator requests a route, naming the various facilities to be used. A flight plan is filed, or a radio request is made, a controller compares the request to his or her needs and a clearance is issued.

Pilot and Air Traffic Controller Communication

288

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE