Your Vor is History

The only reason for VORs is for airways and instrument approaches. With GPS navigation taking over, its difficult to cost-justify ground-based navigation sources like VORs, many of which are nearing the end of their lives. T and Q routes are popping up, reducing the need for VOR-based airways, and many of us would prefer to fly a GPS-based approach than all the other types. Face it: GPS is in; VORs are out.A few years ago, the FAA wanted to axe half the VORs, but users have collectively pushed back. The current plan is to trim the 967 existing VORs by 300, in three phases of 100 each by 2025.But, its a chicken-or-the-egg thing. They cant get rid of the VORs until they get rid of the airways and the approaches. GPS-direct navigation is common already. So, eliminating airways should be reasonably simple. That leaves approaches as the limitation and the short-term solution. So, for now, the FAAs focus is on eliminating ground-based approaches.

Key Takeaways:

• The FAA is systematically transitioning from VORs and ground-based instrument approaches (GBAs) to GPS-based navigation due to cost, obsolescence, and safety benefits.
• This involves a plan to reduce VORs and cancel underutilized or redundant GBAs, using criteria developed with industry input, while facing challenges like user pushback and ensuring alternative navigation.
• GPS approaches, particularly those with vertical guidance (LPV), are rapidly becoming the dominant and preferred method for instrument flying, significantly expanding in number and shifting the air traffic system towards a GPS-centric model.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.