Where were going, we dont need roads

The private pilot/owner planned to fly to at least two back country airports in a neighboring state. His first destination was an unpaved USFS strip. The runway, oriented 11/29, was reported to be 2765 feet long and 50 feet wide. It was located in a narrow valley, and situated about 30 feet southwest of the main road that transited the valley. An unpaved road exited the main road immediately southeast of the threshold of Runway 29, and then turned northwest to initially merge with the runway. About 300 feet northwest of the threshold, the unpaved road diverged slightly southwest of the runway, before assuming a track separate from but parallel to the runway.

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A private pilot mistakenly attempted takeoff from an unpaved road conjoined with the runway instead of the runway itself at a back country airport.
  • During the erroneous takeoff, the aircraft struck a hole and then trees, resulting in substantial damage, though the pilot was uninjured.
  • The confusion was attributed to an unpaved road merging with the runway at the takeoff threshold, a condition not adequately documented in existing flight materials.
  • Following the incident, a cautionary note regarding the road was added to the airport's facility directory to prevent future confusion.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The private pilot/owner planned to fly to at least two back country airports in a neighboring state. His first destination was an unpaved USFS strip. The runway, oriented 11/29, was reported to be 2765 feet long and 50 feet wide. It was located in a narrow valley, and situated about 30 feet southwest of the main road that transited the valley. An unpaved road exited the main road immediately southeast of the threshold of Runway 29, and then turned northwest to initially merge with the runway. About 300 feet northwest of the threshold, the unpaved road diverged slightly southwest of the runway, before assuming a track separate from but parallel to the runway.

The pilot landed uneventfully on Runway 11, and since the wind was calm, planned to depart from Runway 29. He taxied to the end, turned around, and idled for a few minutes while reviewing the next flight leg. He then began his takeoff roll on what he believed to be Runway 29. At some point the left main tire struck a hole. The airplane veered to the left, its left wingtip struck trees, and the pilot lost directional control. The airplane veered further left, struck more trees and came to rest pointed about 90 degrees from the runway heading. The wings and fuselage sustained substantial damage, but the pilot was uninjured.

Subsequently, the pilot recognized he had inadvertently tracked the unpaved road instead of the runway for the takeoff attempt. Review of photographs of the runway environment indicated that the conjoined runway and road was conducive to such confusion. Commercial and FAA documents noted the road crossed the runway about 800 feet from the threshold of Runway 11, but there were no references to the conjoining of the road and runway at the threshold of Runway 29 or the potential for confusing the two. Subsequently, the Idaho Transportation Department added a cautionary note regarding the road to its Airport Facility Directory.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE