Well, I guess you and the FAA will have to spank me. The stabilized approach is just a technique. Some pilots do not believe in this concept and fly decelerating final approaches for a specific reason-better energy available.
The article presents an alternative view to strictly stabilized approaches, suggesting decelerating final approaches can maintain higher kinetic energy for better control, safety, and energy for missed approaches.
One pilot expresses a preference for simple, reliable paper checklists over electronic flight bags (EFBs), citing concerns about battery depletion and input errors during turbulence.
The text highlights several instances of discrepancies or the need for clarification in aviation information, including outdated altimeter source instructions on charts and definitions in weather reports and forecasts.
Well, I guess you and the FAA will have to spank me. The stabilized approach is just a technique. Some pilots do not believe in this concept and fly decelerating final approaches for a specific reason—better energy available.
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.