Certainly following the airways and the MEAs, and then descending over an initial approach fix or hold would be best. I was just thinking of a case when we werent on an airway, like between Keflavik, Iceland (BIKF) and Narsarsuaq, Greenland (BGBW). We wanted to make sure we were above the OROCA and MSAs for that area when we were descending. I guess we could have stayed at our filed FL170 until over the hold, but given that the airport is at sea level we wanted to start a prudently safe descent beforehand.
The article presents a speculative vision for future air traffic control, where digital route transmission to pilots could enhance safety and efficiency, though significant implementation and acceptance efforts would be required.
Multiple sections feature reader letters and author replies debating the practicality and correctness of flight quiz questions, navigation procedures (like crosswind determination in turning flight), and descent guidelines in non-radar environments.
Concerns are raised about the growing issue of unregulated drone activity posing collision risks to manned aircraft, with one account detailing a close encounter and a perceived lack of official response.
The discussion also includes clarifications on interpreting flight charts, such as the use of specific equipment (DME/GPS) to achieve lower minimums on approaches.
