New Jeppesen SIDS and STARS

Airspace redesign, increased use of RNAV and optimum climb/descent profiles complicate and clutter STARs and SIDs. Procedure complexity previously stemmed from complicated lateral paths. Course changes and cross-radials required frequencies to be tuned and OBS knobs spun like the man behind the curtain. (Im supposed to identify each of these stations too?) The HAARP arrival into LaGuardia is an example: tracking outbound on Kingston R-203, the number two radio is set on Deer Park R-338, then number one on the Pawling R-211 or Huguenot R-107 to identify BASYE intersection.

jmiller

Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM ET

Verified

Key Takeaways:

Modern STARs and SIDs have become increasingly complex due to RNAV, 3D/4D flight profiles, and EFB usage, often leading pilots to miss critical information like speed restrictions and lacking crucial terrain awareness.
Jeppesen's updated charts aim to improve situational awareness and EFB usability by depicting terrain/water, MSA/MORA, making charts geo-referenced and to-scale, and using high-contrast, color-coded constraints (blue for altitude, magenta for speed).
The inherent complexity of these procedures is driven by intricate airspace boundaries and inter-facility agreements; the article emphasizes that speed compliance remains a major issue for pilots, especially with the rise of general speed notes.

See a mistake? Contact us.

Airspace redesign, increased use of RNAV and optimum climb/descent profiles complicate and clutter STARs and SIDs. Procedure complexity previously stemmed from complicated lateral paths. Course changes and cross-radials required frequencies to be tuned and OBS knobs spun like the man behind the curtain. (I’m supposed to identify each of these stations too?) The HAARP arrival into LaGuardia is an example: tracking outbound on Kingston R-203, the number two radio is set on Deer Park R-338, then number one on the Pawling R-211 or Huguenot R-107 to identify BASYE intersection.

FMS and GPS magic wonder boxes eliminated lateral navigation complexity. Instead of tuning, identifying and twisting, a pilot could sit back and watch waypoints tick off in the box and the path neatly displayed on the MFD. A coupled autopilot could even fly the jagged line, further reducing pilot workload. But procedure complexity continued increasing, with a third dimension of altitude and a fourth dimension of speed.