The airplane was substantially damaged at approximately 0540 following an intentional gear-up landing. Night visual conditions prevailed. The airline transport pilot and two crew members were not injured. While on final approach, the landing gear switch was selected “down” and the landing gear circuit breaker popped. The pilot initiated the “Emergency Landing Gear Would Not Extend Normally” checklist, but the landing gear did not extend. Despite troubleshooting the malfunction, the gear was confirmed in the retracted position by another pilot utilizing night vision goggles during a low approach. The pilot elected to land gear-up. During the flare, the pilot shut off both engines, and the airplane settled on the runway, sustaining substantial damage.
July 3, 2009, Albuquerque, N.M., Cessna 441 Conquest II
The airplane was substantially damaged at approximately 0540 following an intentional gear-up landing. Night visual conditions prevailed. The airline transport pilot and two crew members were not injured. While on final approach, the landing gear switch was selected "down" and the landing gear circuit breaker popped. The pilot initiated the "Emergency Landing Gear Would Not Extend Normally" checklist, but the landing gear did not extend. Despite troubleshooting the malfunction, the gear was confirmed in the retracted position by another pilot utilizing night vision goggles during a low approach.
Key Takeaways:
- An airplane sustained substantial damage during an intentional gear-up landing after its landing gear failed to extend due to a popped circuit breaker and unsuccessful emergency procedures.
- The retracted landing gear was confirmed by another pilot using night vision goggles prior to the pilot electing to perform the gear-up landing.
- Despite the substantial damage to the aircraft, the airline transport pilot and two crew members were not injured.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
