The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association has been waging a very public battle for several months to reverse what it calls “egregious” overpricing by monopoly FBOs at certain federally funded airports. Now, critics are coming forward to explain why they say AOPA’s numbers are flat out wrong.
In FBO Pricing Dispute, Critics Say AOPA’s Numbers Don’t Add Up
Key Takeaways:
- AOPA has launched a public campaign against what it calls "egregious" overpricing by monopoly FBOs at federally funded airports, filing complaints and threatening further action at numerous locations.
- However, the article finds AOPA's publicized "sky-high" fees (e.g., $300-$575) for light aircraft are significantly exaggerated; actual charges for piston planes at complaint-targeted FBOs are typically minimal ($5-$29) and often waived with a small fuel purchase.
- Critics, including FBO industry representatives, accuse AOPA of using the issue as a membership drive with misleading rhetoric that could harm FBOs and general aviation, noting a lack of support from other major aviation groups.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
