IFR Around the World

Lessons came from all around the world. The instrument flying I learned applies almost 1:1 overseas. Yet, subtle nuances-often procedural-coupled with psychological perceptions of difference, did come to light. For example: While its one thing to be between stations over the Rockies, what about in Bangladesh?

Editorial Staff

Tuesday, February 02, 2016 at 12:00 AM ET

Verified

Key Takeaways:

International IFR flying, while largely similar to North American practices, demands greater pilot self-reliance and meticulous pre-flight planning, particularly in non-radar environments and with challenging terrain.
Pilots must adapt to less detailed ATC guidance, local procedural nuances, and potential resource limitations such as outdated navigation databases or communication style differences.
The experiences underscore that being proactive, precise in communication, and exceptionally thorough in planning all flight phases are critical skills applicable not just abroad but also for enhancing safety and proficiency in domestic IFR operations.

See a mistake? Contact us.

The controller said, “Mooney N231WG, there’s one departed aircraft 12 miles southwest, 7000 feet, climbing FL380. No other traffic indicated. Call when you’re outbound.”

Wait, that’s it? We’re at FL150 20 NM southwest of Narsarsuaq, Greenland, in IMC with 7000-foot peaks all around the sea level airport. And that’s it? It’s up to us to safely descend 15,000 feet on an NDB approach with all those mountains around, not to mention avoid that departed jet? No guidance, no clearance, no radar. Just let them know?