FAA Reportedly Denies Austin Airspace Upgrade

Austin-Bergstrom International Airport falls short of some Class B standards but exceeds others.

Austin tower
A Southwest aircraft taxis in Austin. [Shutterstock]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The FAA reportedly denied Austin's request to upgrade its airspace from Class C to Class B, despite support from local FAA staff and a congressman citing increasing traffic and safety concerns.
  • Local FAA personnel argued the Class B upgrade is necessary to manage Austin's growing workload and enhance flight safety, noting Austin exceeds Class B standards in passenger traffic and is projected to expand significantly.
  • A key motivation for the upgrade is to automatically increase air traffic controller (ATC) salaries by 15%, which supporters believe is critical to address the severe ATC shortage in Austin, where the tower operates with less than half the recommended staff.
  • As an alternative, local FAA staff may pursue an expansion of the current Class C airspace ("Super Charlie"), which would provide some additional authority but not increase pay or significantly boost regulation, and is expected to face further bureaucratic delays.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The FAA has reportedly turned down a request to upgrade the airspace over Austin, Texas, to the same category as many of the nation’s busiest airports.

According to documents secured by public radio station KUT in Austin through the Freedom of Information Act, the FAA’s air traffic manager in Austin and some regional agency staff support elevating Austin from Class C airspace to Class B, which would trigger tighter regulation and automatically raise pay for air traffic controllers (ATCs) there by 15 percent.

The staff argued that Austin’s ATCs need the added powers available in Class B airspace to manage their growing workload and keep flights operating safely.

Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (KAUS) falls short of some required Class B standards. A Class B airport, for instance, must have at least 300,000 takeoffs and landings per year, and KAUS recorded around 260,000 in 2024, according to FAA data.

But supporters of the upgrade note that Austin’s main airport actually exceeds Class B standards in other areas, like total passenger traffic, and will only grow busier as more international flights come online.

Austin-Bergstrom also plans to expand its main Barbara Jordan Terminal and add a new concourse, tentatively dubbed Concourse B, with at least 20 new gates. Those improvements are expected to be completed in the 2030s.

Despite the push from local FAA personnel, a Texas congressman recently disclosed that the FAA has decided to keep Austin’s Class C designation.

“The FAA denied Class B status for Austin in June,” U.S. Representative Lloyd Doggett, a supporter of the upgrade, told KUT. “They’ve been unresponsive to inquiries about that.”

Officially, the FAA maintains that Austin’s proposed airspace upgrade is under review.

Making the Case

According to a KUT analysis of FAA data, some Class B airports actually see fewer takeoffs and landings per year than Austin-Bergstrom, including Tampa, Florida; Memphis, Tennessee; St. Louis, Pittsburgh, and Kansas City, Missouri. These airports were busier than Austin at one time but lost traffic as airline hubs shut down and operations consolidated. Still, their Class B status was not revoked.

Austin is also facing a shortage of ATCs, which could potentially be improved if a future Class B designation increased certified controllers’ minimum salary from $123,305 to $141,804 per year.

Austin’s ATC tower is operating with fewer than half the 60 controllers recommended by FAA and union targets. This shortage has resulted in mandatory overtime and ATCs handling more responsibilities.

According to KUT, the FAA team in Austin may change tactics and seek an expansion of the city’s Class C airspace boundaries. This designation, nicknamed “Super Charlie,” wouldn’t greatly increase regulation or bump up pay for ATCs, but it would give controllers some additional airspace authority.

Even this change, however, could take some time.

“[KAUS tower staff] are told that this will take at least two years after approval,” Doggett said. “So this is bureaucratic delay on top of delay at a time that we really could use a better margin of safety there, given the severe shortage of air traffic controllers.”

Zach Vasile

Zach Vasile is a writer and editor covering news in all aspects of aviation. He has reported for and contributed to the Manchester Journal Inquirer, the Hartford Business Journal, the Charlotte Observer, and the Washington Examiner, with his area of focus being the intersection of business and government policy.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE