Contradictory Departures and Other Stupid Rules

Each pilot must comply with any departure procedures established for that airport by the FAA. Id bet a lunch with the editor of IFR that this excerpt from Part 91.129 (g)was written by some non-flying FAA lawyer. It sounds good by itself, but how do you apply this rule on a day when youre launching IFR but the initial climb is in the clear and in direct violation of the local noise-abatement policy? If you fly the departure, are you in violation? What if you turn for noise, will you get a tongue-lashing from ATC when you check on?

Key Takeaways:

• The article criticizes the FAA's use of vague language in regulations, such as "departure procedures," which creates confusion for pilots and is suspected to be intentional for political leverage.
• This ambiguity can lead to practical conflicts for pilots, for instance, when an IFR departure in clear weather contradicts local noise abatement policies.
• Pilots are strongly advised to always review and understand departure procedures, particularly Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODPs), even when planning an arrival, as they are crucial for safely executing a missed approach.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.