Ch-Ch-Changes

At this point, there really should not be a debate about the beneficial changes implemented during the electronic charting “revolution.” Overlaying a GPS-derived position onto an accurate chart in real time is a trick even entry-level consumer-grade devices can do, with the right software and data. And with the advent of digitized paper charts on those same devices, it’s never been easier—or less expensive—for pilots to keep up with their charting needs. Until I went all-electronic, I’d always used government charts, first provided by NOAA, and then by the FAA’s AeroNav branch. I chose them over Jeppesen’s offerings because the booklets were easier to update than Jepp’s loose-leaf binder system for several reasons.

Key Takeaways:

• While electronic charting offers significant benefits like real-time positioning and ease of access, tracking procedure changes can be more cumbersome compared to traditional paper charts.
• Electronic charts and databases, even when listed as current, may not fully incorporate all published changes from NOTAMs or can contain errors, meaning a "current" database doesn't guarantee complete or accurate information.
• Pilots must remain vigilant, actively cross-referencing multiple data sources (e.g., electronic charting apps, panel navigators, and NOTAMs) to ensure they have the most current and accurate flight information.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.