Ch-Ch-Changes

At this point, there really should not be a debate about the beneficial changes implemented during the electronic charting “revolution.” Overlaying a GPS-derived position onto an accurate chart in real time is a trick even entry-level consumer-grade devices can do, with the right software and data. And with the advent of digitized paper charts on those same devices, it’s never been easier—or less expensive—for pilots to keep up with their charting needs. Until I went all-electronic, I’d always used government charts, first provided by NOAA, and then by the FAA’s AeroNav branch. I chose them over Jeppesen’s offerings because the booklets were easier to update than Jepp’s loose-leaf binder system for several reasons.

Key Takeaways:

• While electronic charting offers advantages like real-time GPS overlays, it has paradoxically made tracking critical procedure changes more cumbersome than traditional paper charts.
• Pilots cannot solely rely on electronic charts or panel-mounted databases, as they may contain inconsistencies with Notams or even errors, necessitating cross-referencing multiple sources for accurate information.
• The increasing complexity of flight procedures and data vendors means pilots must actively check all available information from various sources to ensure safety and stay informed about potential errors or changes.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.