Register

Breaking Up Isn’t Hard To Do

Don’t depend on datalinked Nexrad imagery alone to fly through thunderstorm activity. Instead, stay visual.

1980-Piper-PA-32-301-Saratoga
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Datalink weather radar, such as Nexrad via FIS-B, is not real-time and presents outdated information due to significant processing and transmission latency, which can be much longer than the displayed timestamp.
  • Aviation authorities (FAA, NTSB) explicitly advise pilots against using datalink Nexrad for tactical thunderstorm avoidance, recommending visual observation or real-time airborne radar instead.
  • A fatal accident tragically illustrates the danger of relying on this latent weather data for tactical decisions, as a pilot, misinterpreting outdated information, flew into extreme weather, lost control, and caused an in-flight breakup.
See a mistake? Contact us.

We train pilots to avoid thunderstorms: the FAA-approved distance from a storm is 20 miles. For a variety of reasons, that’s not always practical, and we can find ourselves well within 20 miles of a storm, engaged in some bobbing and weaving to avoid what we think are its worst areas. Those generally show red or purple (magenta? violet?) returns on a radar display. But when our weather radar data comes into our cockpit over a datalink, that’s a bad policy.

The main reason is the time it takes to aim a Nexrad antenna at a storm, collect the return data, process it into something visually useful to humans, and then pack and transmit the results to our airborne airplane. All that takes time. During that time, the storm likely has moved.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE