While I was working on my instrument rating, I sought advice from a number of sources. One group of pilot friends said that with an instrument rating-or even now, to get in the habit-I should file/follow Victor airways. Another group says Why? No need to follow land-based navaids; just file direct.
While filing direct is possible, following airways is often recommended for instrument flight due to route planning needs, potential GPS failure, and current airspace design around terrestrial navaids.
Concerns are raised about the inevitability of drone collisions with manned aircraft, particularly at low altitudes, highlighting the need for tighter restrictions and addressing liability issues.
A suggestion for ATC to vector aircraft by assigned track instead of heading is discussed but deemed impractical due to varied aircraft capabilities, increased complexity, and potential for errors.
FAA approach charts use both miles and RVR for visibility minimums, with single digits typically denoting miles and double digits RVR; pilots must understand this distinction, as some ILS approaches can have unexpectedly high mile-based minimums.
While I was working on my instrument rating, I sought advice from a number of sources. One group of pilot friends said that with an instrument rating—or even now, to get in the habit—I should file/follow Victor airways. Another group says “Why? No need to follow land-based navaids; just file direct.”
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.
