The FAA has a history of costly failures in modernizing air traffic control technology, exemplified by the abandoned $2.5 billion Advanced Automation System (AAS) project.
Its current NextGen initiative relies on the En Route Automation Modernization (ERAM) system, which is significantly flawed, over budget, behind schedule, and unable to reliably perform basic ATC functions like tracking and handing off aircraft.
Despite severe reliability and safety concerns raised by government inspectors and air traffic controllers, the FAA continues to deploy ERAM, forcing controllers to manage live traffic with unproven technology.
This persistent pattern of deploying premature and unreliable technology, coupled with a reluctance to heed expert warnings, casts serious doubt on NextGen's success and the future safety and efficiency of the National Airspace System.
The FAA’s track record on revamping air traffic control is not exactly stellar. Now some of the lessons learned are being ignored. Will we ever learn? For an industry where speed is measured in hundreds of knots, changes in technology do not arrive quickly or easily to aviation.
CREATE A FREE ACCOUNT
Sign up to keep reading
Create a free account to continue. Already a member? Sign in below.
