The pilot was not aware of the length of the runway, and did not walk/survey it prior to the takeoff from the short, wet, soft surface. He used a combination of short- and soft-field takeoff procedures, and after becoming airborne, the “P” factor seemed “unusually strong.” He applied right aileron and rudder in an attempt to maintain directional control, but the right wing then the nose and left wing contacted the ground. The pilot further stated that there was no pre-impact failure or malfunction with the airplane or its systems.
May 13, 2008, Jamestown, Penn., Cessna 172A
The pilot was not aware of the length of the runway, and did not walk/survey it prior to the takeoff from the short, wet, soft surface. He used a combination of short- and soft-field takeoff procedures, and after becoming airborne, the "P" factor seemed "unusually strong." He applied right aileron and rudder in an attempt to maintain directional control, but the right wing then the nose and left wing contacted the ground. The pilot further stated that there was no pre-impact failure or malfunction with the airplane or its systems.
Key Takeaways:
- The pilot was unaware of the short, wet, and soft runway conditions, failing to survey it prior to takeoff.
- After becoming airborne, an "unusually strong" P-factor led to control difficulties, resulting in the right wing, nose, and left wing contacting the ground.
- The pilot reported no pre-impact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane or its systems.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
