Jumpseat: Recurrent Training — FlightSafety Versus the Airlines

Les Abend

Monday, May 05, 2014 at 09:13 PM ET

Verified

Key Takeaways:

The article vividly describes a challenging flight simulator scenario involving an engine failure compounded by a runaway rudder trim, which the pilot successfully navigates.
It contrasts FlightSafety's progressive recurrent training, where maneuvers are signed off once demonstrated and complex, integrated scenarios are encouraged, with the rigid, check-ride-focused structure of Part 121 airline training.
The author suggests that adopting elements of progressive training could benefit Part 121 carriers by reducing check-ride pressure, fostering confidence through complex scenarios, and providing more comprehensive and enjoyable learning.

See a mistake? Contact us.

I advance the power levers slowly. Once I am satisfied with our tracking on the runway centerline, I push them rapidly forward into the takeoff detent. With the acceleration sinking me back into my seat, I glance at the airspeed tape as it rolls past 70 knots. V1. VR. V2.

I apply increasing back pressure to the control yoke. The nose of the airplane lifts off the ground, with the rest of the airplane soon following. As a positive rate of climb is indicated, I raise the gear handle. A few seconds later, the airplane yaws noticeably to the right. My left leg instinctively stiffens as I begin to push on the left rudder pedal. I scan the N1 display on the MFD. Crap! Just as I suspected, the right engine failed.