Airline flying is pretty cushy work most days, particularly at the major US carriers, with largely reliable aircraft, a fairly robust support network, and nearly universal procedures that keep everyone on roughly the same page. Most airline pilots, by temperament and long experience, are perfectly content with the atmosphere of ordered boredom that normally reigns on the flight deck. There are, indeed, very few situations that require the Sully-esque nerves of steel and lightning-quick reflexes with which our species is sometimes credited. These attributes are in fact actively discouraged thanks to a long and distinguished history of airline pilots creating emergencies out of benign situations through overly hasty action. There’s an idiosyncratic phrase in common usage at my airline: “Wind the clock!” It refers to old timepieces that needed daily winding, and the idea is that, in most situations, a captain should be calm and collected enough to reach into their flight kit, fetch their trusty gold pocket watch, and leisurely begin winding it while thinking through their plan of action.
Rejected Takeoffs Reconsidered
Key Takeaways:
- Airline piloting typically values calm, deliberate decision-making, but "no-time threats" like rejected takeoffs require immediate, rote responses, which are extensively trained.
- The author's experience with a low-speed rejected takeoff exposed a hesitation caused by diagnostic thinking, highlighting the importance of adhering to simplified, pre-determined RTO decision protocols.
- The key takeaway for pilots is to improve decision-making during critical moments by incorporating recent maintenance history and anticipated "no-time" threats into pre-flight briefings, preparing for swift and correct action.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
