IFR Lite? Are You Kidding?
I enjoyed Mr. Thorpe’s well-balanced article comparing IFR training in the U.S. and the U.K. (“European IFR Changes” June 2012 IFR). I would, however, like to comment on two of his statements.
Readback: August 2012
Key Takeaways:
- The article raises strong concerns regarding EASA's proposed "En Route IR" (IFR Lite) and other policy changes, arguing they compromise aviation safety by potentially exposing unprepared pilots to unexpected Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) and questioning the rationale behind other changes like the lack of PIREPs.
- It emphasizes the critical importance of the Pilot-in-Command's (PIC) authority and responsibility to refuse unsafe Air Traffic Control (ATC) clearances, particularly when dealing with adverse weather, citing a fatal accident where a pilot may have failed to deviate from a hazardous route.
- The importance of clear and descriptive radio communications is highlighted, with a suggestion for IFR aircraft to include their location (e.g., distance and cardinal direction) in calls to enhance situational awareness for all pilots in the traffic area.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
