Register

Cirrus SR22 Crash Ruling Overturned

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A Minnesota appeals court reversed a $14.4 million verdict that had previously held Cirrus Design Corp. liable for a fatal 2003 SR22 crash.
  • The original lawsuit by the victims' families alleged Cirrus failed to provide sufficient training to the VFR-rated pilot, who crashed in instrument conditions.
  • The appeals court ruled that Cirrus had no legal obligation to ensure the pilot's proficiency, citing a state law designed to prevent "educational malpractice" lawsuits.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A Minnesota appeals court has reversed an earlier ruling that held Cirrus Design Corp. liable for a 2003 SR22 crash that killed two men on a trip to see their sons play in a hockey tournament. The new ruling nullifies the $14.4 million verdict awarded to the families of the two men by a jury of a lower court in 2009.

The crash occurred at dawn on Jan. 18, 2003, approximately eight minutes after pilot Gary Prokop, 47, and James Kosak, 51, took off in marginal VFR conditions in north west Minnesota. According to the NTSB, the Cirrus SR22 crashed into a heavily wooded area after the pilot encountered instrument conditions. Prokop was a VFR, single-engine land pilot working on his instrument rating. He had only 19 hours in an SR22 at the time of the incident.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE