I wanted to write in response to the recent Learning Experience entry
Despite my best efforts, the flight ended well thanks to Buffalo approach. They took me up and over the tops all the way to UCA where I made a simple, safe
288
Little Voices
I wanted to write in response to the recent Learning Experience entry Ground Reference (September 2007) and the idea of ducking under a cloud deck on a flight between Buffalo, N.Y., and New York City. I dont doubt the author knows the route like the back of his hand, so flying it under a low overcast may be safe. Ive flown the route from Buffalo to Utica, N.Y.; the moisture pumped in from the lakes was something else. I didnt want to be high and on top, but I cant recall why. Despite my best efforts, the flight ended well thanks to Buffalo approach. They took me up and over the tops all the way to UCA where I made a simple, safe approach. The ceiling there was at minimums but it was the smoothest air Ive ever flown in, and some of the safest. The writer mentioned hills, but no reference to antennas as he flew. Hills in general are favored by radio stations and cell phone companies, and most often harbor a danger I learned to call "Porcupine Ridge." Every radio station wants to be there.
Key Takeaways:
- Pilots face significant hazards like numerous unmarked antennas ("Porcupine Ridge") when flying at low altitudes, especially under cloud decks.
- The practice of Air Traffic Control (ATC) requiring pilots to change radio frequencies during critical phases of flight (e.g., low and slow after takeoff) is criticized as dangerous and contributing to accidents.
- A reader questions the methodology of headset reviews, advocating for more comprehensive comparisons, inclusion of newer models, and statistical proof to support claims of "best-performing."
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
