I just read your editorial (“Assuming The Position,” October) about “position and hold,” which is now “line up and wait,” which I last heard in fourth grade. It reminded me of when I first began flying in May 1981. In Riverside County, Calif., I learned of a vortac named March; not the month, the air force base. Its still there. A great big you-cant-miss-it vortac everyone knows 288
Feedback
I just read your editorial ("Assuming The Position," October) about "position and hold," which is now "line up and wait," which I last heard in fourth grade. It reminded me of when I first began flying in May 1981. In Riverside County, Calif., I learned of a vortac named March; not the month, the air force base. Its still there. A great big you-cant-miss-it vortac everyone knows about, next to March Air Force Base. I hadnt been flying long when the FAA renamed the vortac, in its eminent wisdom, to Homeland. I pondered: Why in the world would the FAA-which obviously had way too much time on its hands-rename the Vortac from a well-known feature, March Air Force Base, to an obscure name, Homeland? No one knew.
Key Takeaways:
- Readers debate the effectiveness of aviation regulatory changes and the necessity for the U.S. to align more closely with international aviation standards for safety and global interoperability.
- Concerns are raised about deficiencies in pilot training, specifically the challenge of motivating flight instructors to prioritize critical decision-making and emergency procedure instruction due to limitations in logging training hours.
- The article clarifies misconceptions surrounding aircraft maintenance checks, particularly differentiating between actual regulatory requirements for static pressure systems and transponders versus commonly assumed but not mandated pitot system tests.
See a mistake? Contact us.
