FAA's Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative

FAA’s Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative

Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 03:51 PM ET

Verified

General aviation is by far the best way to get around Alaska, but the state's size, terrain, weather and lack of infrastructure can make it riskier than in the Lower 48. Here, a float-equipped Cessna A18SF Skywagon operated by the U.S.Department of the interior departs Anchorage's Lake Hood, the largest seaplane base in the world. Photo Credit: Jereon Stroes Aviation Photography

Key Takeaways:

Alaska's aviation system has a significantly higher accident rate than the rest of the U.S., largely due to outdated infrastructure that lags decades behind the lower 48.
The FAA's Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative (FAASI) identified critical deficiencies, including a severe lack of usable instrument approaches, inadequate weather reporting, and obsolete navigation routes, which impede safe IFR operations.
While FAASI recommends expanding IFR capabilities through satellite-based navigation (RNAV T-routes) and ADS-B coverage, its proposed solutions are mostly general, emphasizing continued evaluation and study rather than concrete, immediate implementation plans.

See a mistake? Contact us.

Due to Alaska’s wide-ranging geography and limited road system, residents are heavily dependent upon air travel. In October, the FAA released the final report of its Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative (FAASI), which provides an up-to-date look at the continued problems plaguing the state’s aviation infrastructure. Completed in response to a 2020 recommendation from the NTSB, FAASI was designed to work with stakeholders in Alaska to “review, prioritize and integrate” the state’s safety needs with the FAA’s own processes.

The end result included input from about 100 individuals and organizations, who offered their insight and opinions on problems ranging from poor weather reporting to a lack of IFR routes. While the FAASI recommendations are all largely general in nature and skewed toward continued evaluation, development and study of various concerns, the final report (along with its earlier interim report released in April) is a document well worth reviewing.