Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. “A safety 288
Charting 2.0
Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. "A safety hazard," I pointed out to anyone who would listen.
Key Takeaways:
- The author has gradually adopted portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit but expresses reservations about fully transitioning to all-electronic charting due to concerns about computer reliability.
- A primary critique is that current electronic charts merely replicate paper formats, failing to leverage the interactive and safety-enhancing capabilities of digital platforms.
- The author advocates for "charting 2.0," proposing new features like geo-referencing, interactive briefings, and performance calculations to better emphasize critical safety information.
- A call is made for organizations like the FAA, ICAO, and EASA to collaborate on developing these next-generation electronic charts, acknowledging the significant liability involved.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
