We’ve clearly stated in a previous article that an instructor signoff is not required if you’re using a simulator (ATD) to maintain your instrument currency per 14 CFR 61.57(c) (3). So has the FAA. Then, in another article, we’ve just as clearly stated that an instructor signoff is, indeed, required. And, so has the FAA. Perhaps this controversy is something we should explore.
Under the Hood
Controversy is always a ripe subject for IFR, so we dug into this from different angles. We looked inside the FAA and found a can of worms. We researched the applicable Aviation Circular, AC-61.136A. We spoke to a couple different ATD manufacturers. We examined the simulators’ Letters of Authorization that formally specify what can be done in an Aviation Training Device or ATD, which can be either Basic (BATD) or Advanced (AATD). We researched the Federal Register as well as letters from the FAA’s Office of Chief Counsel.
