Unicom

Unicom: 11/04

Grossing Out
I very much enjoyed the article on weight and balance (Positioning Pounds, July 2004). It is my understanding that the poor full-fuel payloads we see in virtually all of our Part 23 single-engine aircraft have to do with the manufacturers meeting the rather arbitrary 61 knot Vso requirement.

For instance, the new TBM 700C2 max gross weight was increased by 815 pounds because Socata took advantage of an exception to the 61 knot Vso requirement. It had to provide crashworthy seats able to tolerate 20-G decelerations. The Vso for the 700C2 is 65 knots. Same wing and same engine as other TBMs, yet it gets a tremendous increase in max weights. Also, the FAA grants…

Read More »

Unicom: 10/04

Right-Of-Way?
Your July 2004 article, Five Pattern Sins, includes the statement, The classic conflict is the straight-in approach that T-Bones an airplane on base leg which, technically, has the right of way. I dont think the FARs agree.

While the lower aircraft is usually the one with the right-of-way, an aircraft on final approach has the right-of-way over all other aircraft in flight. This means downwind, base and anywhere other than on final.

Final approach is not defined in the regulations; the AIM attempts to define as the leg of the pattern between base and the runway along the runway centerline, but its not a comonly accepted definition. The Pilot/Controll…

Read More »

Unicom: 08/04

Experience Yourself
Paul Bertorellis article (June 2004) describing a flight from Florida to Oklahoma through a line of thunderstorms ended with his co-pilot wondering aloud how a less-experienced pilot-say a new Cirrus owner with 300 hours-could learn to do what they had just done. It got me thinking how Ive been approaching the answer to this question.

I am just shy of 300 hours and earned my Instrument rating last fall. Ive actively sought out flyable IMC, amassing 50 hours of actual instrument time, and I purchased a well-equipped Grumman Tiger. Knowing your personal flying machine is a prerequisite for safe IFR flying. For me, thats been the easy part. I bought a ma…

Read More »

Unicom: 07/04

Whos Safer?
As a lifetime subscriber to your magazine I just want to tell you what a great job you are doing. Your magazine has made me a much better pilot. I do have a question, though: Have you done any studies regarding high-time pilot accidents vs. low-time pilot accidents (GA only)? Are high-time pilots safer (or at least involved in fewer accidents) than low-time pilots? Seems to me that for every 200-300 hour pilot who has an accident, there is 2000-3000 hour pilot who has an accident as well.

-Kevin Hughes
Via e-mail


Were glad you keep coming back, Kevin.

To answer your question, we turned to the NTSB, and its Annual Review of Aircraft Accid…

Read More »

Unicom: 06/04

Lancair vs. Cirrus
In your article on Cirrus safety record, you say there has yet to be an accident involving a U.S. registered Lancair Columbia. We can think of one, the 1999 crash of N141LC.

-Rae Willis
Morristown, N.J.


Well, it was and it wasnt. That crash involved a non-conforming prototype and, although it did occur after Lancair had received certification for the design, we aim to include only real airplanes flown in a real world manner. For that reason, we also did not include the crash of another Lancair during spin test training when the spin chute would not release.

The accident you cite is a unique case because it involved a factory test…

Read More »

Unicom: 05/04

Cirrus vs. Cessna
I thought your article Has Cirrus Delivered? [Safety Review, March] was particularly interesting because it so happens that I owned a Cessna 182S and a Cirrus 20. When I checked the statistics and fleet size of the two airplanes, I discovered to my amazement that the 182S had a higher accident rate than Cirrus.

I am somewhat confused by the statistics in the chart that indicate that the 182S and 182T have suffered seven fatal accidents. When I checked the NTSB database, 10 fatal accidents are recorded, eight for the 182S [mine included] and two to the 182T. The conclusion that I reached that for the period of 1999 to 2002, was that Cessna had more accide…

Read More »

Unicom: 04/04

Dump the Overheads
After reading Chuck Griswolds letter, Danger from the Overhead [Unicom, February] and Mr. Bertorellis response, what disturbs me most was Mr. Bertorellis comment regarding ..merely in the service of lowest common denominator behavior…

The LCD reference, at least to me, has always implied less intelligent or less skilled. And it seems to in this case as well. If that was the authors intent, then I take strong exception and I think your editors should as well, for what he is suggesting is that this is a technique that can be used by better pilots as long as they use common sense. On the assumption that that was the intended message, allow me…

Read More »

Unicom: 03/04

Casting Aspersions
To say that I am outraged would be a gross understatement! For the first time in my many years of reading the NTSB reports section of your periodical I noted that you identified the pilot by name in the report on the October 2 accident in Clayton, Ga.

In my opinion, you callously insulted perhaps the greatest aviator in aviation history, bar none. I have followed the career of Gen. Yeager since my Air Force days with SAC in the mid-50s and have always had the greatest of respect and admiration for the man.

His work as a test pilot in the 40s, 50s and 60s probably saved the lives of more pilots in the Air Force (and general aviation, for that matter…

Read More »
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE