The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association has been waging a very public battle for several months to reverse what it calls “egregious” overpricing by monopoly FBOs at certain federally funded airports. Now, critics are coming forward to explain why they say AOPA’s numbers are flat out wrong.
In FBO Pricing Dispute, Critics Say AOPA’s Numbers Don’t Add Up
Key Takeaways:
- The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) is publicly campaigning against "egregious" overpricing by monopoly FBOs at federally funded airports, filing FAA complaints and threatening further action based on reported high fees.
- The article challenges AOPA's claims, demonstrating that the "outrageous" fees (e.g., $300-$575) publicized by the association are highly exaggerated for piston aircraft, with actual charges often significantly lower and frequently waived with fuel purchases; the higher figures typically apply to business jets.
- Critics argue AOPA's campaign may be a membership drive and warn its actions could harm the FBO industry and broader general aviation, noting that other major aviation groups have not joined AOPA's efforts.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
