Register

Readback May 2023

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The FAA's shift to Performance Based Navigation means unmonitored VORs restrict alternate IFR approach planning unless an aircraft has suitable RNAV/GPS to substitute.
  • Pilots are encouraged to offer air traffic controllers flights to provide them with firsthand experience of flight challenges, fostering mutual understanding.
  • While regulations may not explicitly prohibit landing when the runway rollout is obscured by fog, it is unsafe and could lead to a "careless or reckless operation" violation.
  • A proposed "Runway Incursion Prevention System" (RIPS) aims to reduce incidents by displaying progressive taxi instructions on the ground, but faces challenges in gaining FAA review due to the agency's cautious stance on new technology and potential workload concerns.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Alternate Mins NA?

As the FAA is transitioning the National Airspace System (NAS) to Performance Based Navigation (PBN), more and more we see VORs becoming unmonitored or unserviceable. When a VOR is NOTAMed “unmonitored,” my understanding is that if you can identify it in the aircraft (Morse code) and have a good signal, you can use it. Where it becomes an issue is in preflight IFR planning—you cannot use an IAP that is based on the unmonitored VOR as an alternative for flight planning (although I could not find an AIM or FAR reference…).

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE