Register

Landing On The Shore

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A reader criticized a pilot's articles for promoting adventurous flying (e.g., low-visibility VFR, night mountain flying, beach landings) that, while legal, may lack a sufficient margin of safety and be inappropriate for an "aviation safety" magazine.
  • The magazine's editor defended publishing such content, stating its purpose is to explore personal aviation risks, identify them, and educate pilots on how to minimize them.
  • The editor highlighted the pilot's thorough pre-flight planning, detailed risk management, and adherence to regulations as key takeaways, setting a high standard for managing flights to unfamiliar or challenging destinations.
See a mistake? Contact us.

With reference to Mike Hart’s article, “Landing On The Shore” in the October 2020 issue, I, too, have utilized many remote mountain airstrips, including many in his native Idaho. I, too, enjoy the adventure of new challenges, but have some questions about his tradeoffs between legal versus safe. In a sidebar, he documents the legality of departing VFR with a mile visibility and a 400-foot ceiling, albeit with a few “holes,” but knowing of blue skies above. Flying at 400 feet over a gray ocean under a gray overcast is much like the “white-out” conditions encountered over snow on a cloudy day, or, for that matter, skiing in equivalent conditions.

I wrote you once before a few years ago about one of his articles in which he relished flying “on top” at night over the high mountains of central Idaho. Beautiful, I’m sure, but with no margin of safety in the event of an engine failure. (Unlike me, I guess he has not yet experienced one in the mountains.)

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE