Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. “A safety 288
Charting 2.0
Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. "A safety hazard," I pointed out to anyone who would listen.
Key Takeaways:
- The author, despite initial skepticism, is gradually transitioning to electronic flight devices but expresses concerns about full reliance on them.
- A primary criticism is that current electronic charts are merely digitized versions of paper formats, failing to leverage the interactive capabilities of modern hardware.
- The article advocates for aviation authorities (FAA, ICAO, EASA) to collaborate on "charting 2.0," developing truly interactive and safety-enhanced digital charts.
See a mistake? Contact us.
