Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. “A safety 288
Charting 2.0
Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. "A safety hazard," I pointed out to anyone who would listen.
Key Takeaways:
- The author, while having transitioned from paper to electronic devices for cockpit information, expresses concerns about the reliability of fully digital charting and the lack of innovation in their design.
- The primary critique is that current electronic charts merely digitize traditional paper formats without leveraging the interactive and safety-enhancing capabilities of modern digital platforms.
- The article advocates for "charting 2.0," suggesting features like geo-referencing, interactive briefings, pre-approach checklists, and real-time performance calculations to improve safety and utility.
- It calls for collaborative efforts from organizations like the FAA, ICAO, and EASA to rethink and develop next-generation electronic chart technology.
Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->
See a mistake? Contact us.
