Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. “A safety 288
Charting 2.0
Although Ive been accused of having Luddite tendencies, Im usually open to trying new things and doing old things differently. That said, a few years ago, I regularly ranted about proliferating portable electronic devices (PEDs) in the cockpit, usually focusing on the maze of power and data cables required. "A safety hazard," I pointed out to anyone who would listen.
Key Takeaways:
- The author, while gradually adopting electronic devices in the cockpit, observes that digital aviation charts merely replicate paper formats without leveraging the capabilities of modern platforms.
- A central argument is the missed opportunity to innovate chart technology beyond static maps, especially for terminal procedures, to enhance safety and usability.
- The article advocates for "charting 2.0" with features like geo-referencing, interactive briefings, and clearer emphasis on critical information, urging regulatory bodies like the FAA and ICAO to collaborate on its development.
See a mistake? Contact us.
