Going It Alone

I enjoyed Decembers article on tips to manage the workload of single pilot IFR flight ("Six SPIFR Tips"). One thing I think is often overlooked on this topic is the distinction between single-pilot and solo-pilot IFR operations. I use my plane for business and Angel Flight operations in the northeast, which presents the opportunity and need for a considerable number of LIFR flights into Class B airports. On most occasions (obviously excepting Angel Flights), I fly not only SPIFR, but solo operations. My observation is, from a safety standpoint, I would rather fly solo in demanding conditions than with non-IFR rated passengers. Why? Simply because inexperienced passengers can be distracting and unpredictable. When flying a SPIFR approach, one needs to find time for a passenger briefing amidst all the other approach chores. And even then, Ive come to expect the unexpected: passengers waving a hand in my face after breaking out to point out an airliner on parallel final as Im establishing my crosswind crab angle, reading back my landing clearance and keeping my speed below VLE.

Key Takeaways:

• Operating solo in demanding single-pilot IFR conditions can be safer than flying with potentially distracting or unpredictable non-IFR rated passengers.
• A reader challenged a previous article's claim of 1900 feet for stall recovery in a Mooney, stating personal experience indicates much lower altitude losses are typical.
• VFR pilots operating outside Class B, C, or D airspace are not obligated to follow unsolicited ATC vectors, as ATC can only suggest headings in such circumstances.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.